How we decide which accounts get real effort:
Six signals and one overlap rule.
A few weeks ago we said most of our list time now goes into searching for indicators of urgency.
These are the ones we watch:
1. Role changes. A new CRO or Head of Growth arrives with a mandate. Their first quarters are when providers get evaluated.
2. Hiring in the area. A company hiring for the function you sell into has budget and attention on that problem already.
3. Recent funding. Fresh capital, pressure to show traction, more appetite to test.
4. Website visits. The quietest signal: they already came looking, before anyone contacted them.
5. Content engagement. What someone interacts with tells you what they are thinking about this month.
6. Competitor engagement. The warmest one. Interacting on a direct competitor's posts means they are already comparing options.
A single signal proves little on its own.
A job change is routine, a funding round is news. But each of them usually means something inside the company is moving.
The part we find most interesting is when there's overlap.
One signal is easy to dismiss as coincidence. When a second and a third land on the same account within a few weeks, it stops looking like coincidence and starts looking like a buying window.
That is the reading we are testing now.
Every account on the list gets contacted sooner or later. What the signals change is the effort: good fit plus two or three signals means deeper research, and a more personal message.

In most B2B companies, content and outbound live in different rooms. Run as one loop, each side feeds the other
Read →
Finance vocabulary gets flagged as spam and CFOs read inflated claims as a reason to say no. What 105,000+ emails taught us
Read →
Metrics tell you what happened, replies tell you why. The real diagnosis lives in reading positive and negative replies together
Read →This is how we think and execute. If you want to see how it would apply to your case, let's talk.